Couldn't you just try (x,y/10,z) or something similar? I think it would
still allow for overhangs, while diminishing the appearance of floating
rocks.

And yes, I'm still around (sort of :).

~Sam

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote:
> I tried (x,0,z) but it looked a bit boring. I agree the flying rocks look
> wierd, but my brother might be able to get rid of them in photoshop when he
> works on the pictures so I didn't fix them.
>
> --
> Tek
> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "Mike Williams" <nos### [at] econymdemoncouk> wrote in message
> news:Rtp### [at] econymdemoncouk...
> > I'm not sure whether I like those flying rocks in BG-1.jpg.
> >
> > It looks like you intended to use an isosurface function with (x,0,z),
> > like a height field, but typed (x,y,z) by mistake.
> >
> > --
> > Mike Williams
> > Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message